What is another term for reductio ad absurdum?

In logic, reductio ad absurdum (Latin for “reduction to absurdity”), also known as argumentum ad absurdum (Latin for “argument to absurdity”) or apagogical arguments, is the form of argument that attempts to establish a claim by showing that the opposite scenario would lead to absurdity or contradiction.

What is the opposite of reductio ad absurdum?

Antonyms. prepared ready careful exempt fall short of stay in place unmake.

How do you use reductio ad absurdum in a sentence?

For some reason, this strikes me as the reductio ad absurdum of the whole project. Opposition to stem-cell research is the reductio ad absurdum of the right-to-life argument. It’s an entertaining reductio ad absurdum against those who complain about the unfairness of low-cost production by foreigners.

What is the meaning of the Latin word reductio ad absurdum?

reduction to absurdity
reductio ad absurdum, (Latin: “reduction to absurdity”), in logic, a form of refutation showing contradictory or absurd consequences following upon premises as a matter of logical necessity.

What is reduction to the absurd?

Reductio ad absurdum is also known as “reducing to an absurdity.” It involves characterizing an opposing argument in such a way that it seems to be ridiculous, or the consequences of the position seem ridiculous.

What is it called when you take an argument to the extreme?

Description: Erroneously attempting to make a reasonable argument into an absurd one, by taking the argument to the extremes.

Is reductio ad absurdum a fallacy?

Sheldon: He’s engaging in reductio ad absurdum. It’s the logical fallacy of extending someone’s argument to ridiculous proportions and then criticizing the result.

Is reductio ad absurdum valid?

Reductio ad Absurdum is clearly a valid argument form. Yet logicians tend in their writings either to ignore it or to treat it in a confusing and confused way.

What is appeal to extremes?

What is meant by absurdity?

Definition of absurd (Entry 1 of 2) 1 : ridiculously unreasonable, unsound, or incongruous an absurd argument : extremely silly or ridiculous absurd humor. 2 : having no rational or orderly relationship to human life : meaningless an absurd universe also : lacking order or value an absurd existence.

What is a logical absurdity?

Description: A mode of argumentation or a form of argument in which a proposition is disproven by following its implications logically to an absurd conclusion.

What is the meaning of word Corsair?

pirate
Definition of corsair : pirate especially : a privateer of the Barbary Coast.

What does it mean to Mourad?

Its Arabic meaning can be translated roughly into wanted, desired, wished for, yearned or goal.

What do you mean by lucidity?

Definition of lucidity 1 : clearness of thought or style the lucidity of the explanation. 2 : a presumed capacity to perceive the truth directly and instantaneously : clairvoyance when the spirit is drawn to lucidity by the immediacy of death— Graham Greene.

What is an example of reductio ad absurdum?

Retrieved 21 July 2009. ^ Reductio Ad Absurdum is for example frequently found in Plato’s Republic, documenting Socrates’ attempts to guide listeners to his conclusions about justice, democracy and friendship. It was also used by the United States Supreme Court when it handed down its ruling in the 1954 case of Brown v.

What is the meaning of ad absurdum?

a self-contradiction ( ad absurdum) a falsehood ( ad falsum or even ad impossible) an implausibility or anomaly ( ad ridiculum or ad incommodum)

Who invented reductio ad absurdum in math?

The technique was also a focus of the work of Aristotle (384–322 BCE). Greek mathematicians proved fundamental propositions utilizing reductio ad absurdum. Euclid of Alexandria (mid-3rd – mid-4th centuries BCE) and Archimedes of Syracuse (c. 287 – c. 212 BCE) are two very early examples.

What is an example of a reductio argument?

The earliest Greek example of a reductio argument is supposedly in fragments of a satirical poem attributed to Xenophanes of Colophon (c. 570 – c. 475 BCE). Criticizing Homer’s attribution of human faults to the gods, he states that humans also believe that the gods’ bodies have human form.